Your ridiculous hypocrisy about Social media control

Your entire discourse about social media control is so insane it will drive your kids even more mad , faster and stronger.

And we'll calmly explain why and what to do about it.

(From the technical experts that actually built the current version of it, to then be abused and discredited for suggesting it in the first place. )

All your children are confronted with phone addicted adults that prioritise looking at a screen in their pocket obsessively all day long. So you're showing them the completely wrong behaviour , while telling them they should never do this.

Literally being drunk off your ass... smoking joint dangling from one corner of your mouth... slurping up pills through the other corner (which is drooping down from having partial facial paralysis, which you try to compensate by injecting botulism and injecting sillicone and other people's fat to then smear some toxic chemicals over it)

And while you look that way you tell your kids how dangerous it is, and that they're too young to handle it, so you're taking it away from them.

All because you think... "There's nothing else we can do" ... Guess where that way of thinking comes from?

Anyways... You see the problem right? You'll drive them completely insane this way. It won't help... it's just replacing one insane maniac with another... but you prefer to outsource it I guess?

The technical solutions are super simple... go back to the start and realize its basic platform was implemented completely illegally in the first place , and enforce the laws that were always a good idea when it comes to being allowed to provide a commercial service within your jurisdiction.

Compare it with cars for instance. Everyone can buy a car... and choose to void the warranty by unscrewing each and every little bolt and screw of that combustion engine if you so desire. After that exercise , where all those parts are taken apart you can say... "Aha... that's how this thing I bought works"

It's illegal to put in a black box that specifically evades the possibility of that... Dieselgate anyone? The precedent is there.

And now to the internet... because it's not a "Social media" problem. It's an internet problem.

There are no technical limitations in not only receiving the core data of a web request, on top of which there is a graphical representation of how to show it to you.

It's not always everything in the data... you're perfectly capable of downloading not just how it looks... but the "source page" including CSS and the HTML that your browser uses to make it look different than just a flat piece of ascii characters. But every techy can immediately find which text is in there that WASNT SHOWN though... And that's how it should be. We shouldn't be downloading screenshots of a news page... we still get the full HTML source of every news page and that should never change.

And on social media... the "pipeline" of which data to represent and the choices implemented there everything can also easily be exposed without any difficulty or risk to their supposed business too. (If they refuse, they show their true intentions)

Any and all complaints about this concerning IP and operational security are total bullshit. The product of combustion engines and services built upon them like taxis perfectly prove this. So don't even go there. (It's the openness of the product that guarantees this actually... think about it, because that's the only way you know that someone else hasen't copied your patent... since everyone can see how everything is made)

Today they're hiding how the engine works, because they're selling you a car that injects drugs into your system ... tells the criminals where you passed out to then come and do with you what they want. If you'd screw open te dashboard you'd immediately see it... which is why they need to make you believe it will explode in your face if you even think about it. That's not a commercial product... that's a weapon forced upon you if you're addicted. )

The internet has been implemented illegally from the start and you let them get away with it because you don't understand anything about how it works and what would be the legal implementation. They bamboozled all legislatures with that from the start and are still lying about it to you each and every time.

It's exactly the same with all AI products by the way... It can't reason , it's just the illusion of it. It can only regress faster and faster in total nothingness , and they know that perfectly...

Which is why it's presented as a magic black box... just like the "algorithms"... (Those two things have always been the same)

And again... the IP fallacy makes no sense whatsoever since the only differences are tactics... You can't patent a tactic of illegal abuse of people... that's illegal remember? Apart from that tactic.. they're all using the same protocols and technology. There's nothing new there for over 30 years now. And then they IPO another flavour of the same thing to steal money to do it again, making you believe again it's "secret sauce" can't and shouldn't be revealed, and no... it's impossible to produce any good results or profit in logic or reality... but that just means it needs to be bigger until everyone is hooked in that fantasy and then they make you forget it ever happened anyways.... either through indoctrination ... or just a plain gun to your head at that point. ummm... all dictatorships ever? Ring a bell? Yes... deliberate strategy since the Y2K "crisis" ... which was already a version of that bullshit. Total access to all backbone systems was the goal there. Given freely , so it didn't need to be stolen. That was doozy wasn't it? By selling a nonsensical fear of imminent apocalypse... Seeing a pattern there?

If you don't know how it works... you can't fix it... and you definitely can't legislate or enforce it properly.

(And listening to the one giving you that "broken" tech, to fix it... isn't going to help is it? Let's ask Goebbels how to stop the nazi's shall we? )

It's really simple folks. If a website doesn't do it right... block it. It's not a product.. it's not a service... it's a weapon.

All we need is a legal version of the basic data retrieval protocols. The current ones in use are clearly illegal and have always been.

The operational security paradigm is also pure crap, since this way of ours it's continuously red-team tested by each and every user from the first one to the last one. Fail that and it removes itself from the equation anyways. A core principle of what they all scream on an open market right?

If it ain"t broke don't fix it? That does not apply if you don't know how it works, and if a criminal gets to decide what "broken" means.

If it doesn't work according to law and the intention of the law... it's illegal. There was a reason for that remember?

No? Can't remember?

You spaced out and started looking at your phone didn't you?

Yup... that thing.

Guess who gave you that... And there isn't a legal thing in that fancy brick of yours.

Not a single one.