The devolution of humanity

ummm.. it's a direction of humanity. And we haven't been evolving... we are obviously devolving.

But we get lost in discussions of Ism's. (there's this tiny little indication of why that is here)

Discussion about Ism's... is devolution. Let's just call that.. Ismism ?

So, Ismism is bad. evolution is good.

And let's have a little conversation here about what the direction of evolution would mean. (Since we've just defined quite extensively in that article how the direction of devolution looks like in this contemporary repetition of it)

War is agression.

Cooperation between diverse actors is creation, cooperation between identical actors is regression.

This applies on all layers. Between individuals, between businesses, between languages, between cultures, between religions, between economical ideologies, between societal ideologies, between countries.

And it is unmistakable that each human is born with an instinct and desire for creation and to oppose regression.

When agression arises, it's because two actors don't agree on which direction is creation, and which direction is regression.

Even though they are obviously both telling themselves it's the right direction since we're all driven to create, not regress.

Attempting to reach creation , by inhibiting creation somewhere else, only looks like cooperation in the mind of the selfish actor.

So when discourse reaches the point of disagreement, there is only one logical step , and that is to simply state what you consider to be progress and why.

And if the two actors don't agree on the definition of that, they cannot cooperate.

And the only logical action for someone or something feeling or thinking the other side is deluding itself that this direction that was indicated is creation, but you don't agree, and yet there is still pressure to seek what they call cooperation... then it is but normal that cooperation ceases.

There is always a third option that public discourse tends to ignore more and more.

Which is a clear indication of the regression of humanity.

This was just described in a certain style... And i'll now describe the exact same thing in a different style too.

This is a presentation of a stark dichotomy: creation (cooperation between diverse actors) versus regression (cooperation between identical actors). Aggression, then, is the breakdown of this dynamic. When two forces collide, each convinced of their own path to progress, unable to reconcile their visions.

The Illusion of Shared Progress

The tragedy lies in the self-deception: both sides believe they are acting in the name of creation, yet their methods inhibit the other’s. This is not true cooperation but coercion in disguise , a demand for compliance under the banner of "progress." When discourse fails, the natural response is separation, not submission.

Yet modern discourse increasingly denies this third option. disengagement. Instead, it demands forced consensus, branding dissent as backwardness. This refusal to acknowledge irreconcilable differences is itself a form of regression, a denial of the fundamental diversity that fuels creation.

The Third Option: Dissolution Over Dominance

If two systems cannot align in vision, the only honest resolution is separation, not annihilation. History’s greatest conflicts arise not from pure hatred, but from the insistence that one truth must govern all. The refusal to permit divergence is the true aggression.

And this is something that i'm sure of... every human on the planet agrees with logically and just feels too.

And it is super clear that all humans want to see this behaviour in the orginations they create to organise them. And it is super clear that it only goes wrong when their organisations become antagonistic to the elements they're created out of. The systems enter devolution when that happens and the only logical conclusion is to seperate. The government loses it's citizens. It can try to delay that with violence... but devolution just ends in death no matter what.

The disucssions of Ism's... is just debating how fast it happens without changing the direction.

Ismism is the same as war, ismism is the same as a collapsing society. Every ism has a different speed at it, but they don't even agree on that and that's an ism too.

so... let's just let it go.

How would the movement of Anti-war be defined then? How should we define evolution clearly? How do we define the proper direction clearly? It's quite simple for really, and we simply need to coalesce Anti-war movements into a logical discource that cannot be refuted.

And that discourse should provide a set of logical tools to adress each and every situation. A sort of flowchart of how to react to which situations, and there's always time to do that, since if anyone says that it's really needed now to fix something old out of the paradigm of devolution... then we've already reached the proper step in that flowchart.

Everything today is devolving... so... "urgency" has now become a clear and undeniable indication of rushing into the wrong direction.. hence. Wrong , and doesn't grow cooperation and thus seperation of that relationships is the only logical reaction.

But then... you need alternatives right? Well , there always are, but you need the time to define them and we're helping you out there too actually.

Here we go!

The organic superstructure of relationships

Here is my dream.

I will not see it come to light in my lifetime , but out of my internal motivations comes the eternal dedication to keep working on achieving it in some distant future.

It is a concept of intra-human relationships that is vastly different from everything we’re used too. Completely different from all the prisons we have built for ourselves in thoughts and emotions.

We have to start over out of a place of love. And this can only be done together with other people who have first learned to love themselves, and are continuously improving their own version of their internal Cuju game. It’s not important how they see , structure or organize this language within themselves. The Cuju analogy is simply mine. My own little private religion if you will. My own little completely private language between my feelings, and my thoughts.

This is not something that can be given , but it is something that each individual has the duty to construct within itself. The fact that we have all been taught that we should have others tell us how we should operate internally is a peculiarly nasty prison. And all children relationships that come out of that one are peculiarly nasty prisons too.

It is the same time the biggest question in the world , and also the smallest question in the world.

How should my thoughts and emotions talk to each other. And that will then define everything else in your life , but that way it is also added in the mix of all individuals in the world.

And it is very obvious that this world has been suffering from a lot of internal solutions that are not formed out of love.

It is a big and difficult question that needs to be resolved between every individual’s thoughts and emotions. And there are only a few reactions to it that are possible.

- solution-taking

- solution-giving

- Self-improvement

I’ll go a bit deeper in all three aspects now , because these are extremely important basic principles that will constantly need to be fought against. Because it seems that the best way to quickly identify whether or not the internal motivations of a relationship are a loving one, or one leading to prisons… is to observe the quality of the game being played, and try to determine which one of these three it is. It is also really important to observe that the efficiency of it is not important at all. Only the quality of the relationship matters. The quality of it being capable of love and improvement.

So first I’ll describe the three possible logical courses of action to take when faced with this biggest question of all, before I describe how to tell them apart from each other in all situations big and small , and then we need to go into the distinction of the quality and efficiency of them.

Solution-taking

It is a tough question to face for sure. Especially when you’re already in a super-structure of prisons, and the excuses you have already been making are extremely numerous and well trained. A “What , I’m going to have to live a life where I am constantly working on improving myself!? I deserve better then this! I want a vacation from this before I even started!” sort of thing in an endless loop. The victim-minds of societies prisons have been told to take it personal… they have been told that it is an insult that they should improve themselves. They have been told the question is already solved and they shouldn’t even think about it themselves. It’s probably too difficult anyways and I might fail. I’ve tried before and failed so it’s not worth it anymore.

But this state of mind is at a strong cognitive dissonance with your reality, since your emotions are there, and your thoughts are there. These is nowhere to go , and nowhere to escape too. Because it is only the relationship between those two that together create the fact that you exist anyways.

It is their relationship that has created your identity , your ID, your soul , your being … You are not just your body with a brain. That’s just the physical platform which has formed a relationship with your identity. And your identity is created by the relationship of your thoughts and your emotions.

There is no escape. This is your home. This is where you are and what you are. And if you do not resolve the game between your thoughts and your emotions into a game that constantly keeps improving itself , then that relationship is without love. And then all external relationships will be without love. And then your world becomes without love.

But once you have lost hope , once you have come to the conclusion that you can’t do this… then the prison becomes permanent. Just like it happened to Wilson in 1984.

Once you are ready to always simply pass on all your grief and misery born out of being love-less…

Then you have become a solution-taker. An there are many forms in which this world creates opportunities for solution-takers. From religions , to countries, to political systems , to healthcare and on and on and on…

All our societies across all of history have all , always degraded into mass enablement of the “solution-taking” state of mind. It doesn’t matter if its communism or democracy , it doesn’t matter if it’s Islam or Christianity , it doesn’t matter if it’s this country or that , this culture or that , this place or that…

The only thing that matters … is that if there is a mass grouping of solution-taking minds… that group will go and sit in prisons within prisons within prisons and together descend into chaos and misery , slowly… but very surely indeed. Because the only thing they can do , is to create more prisons into the ones they already hate. They never leave the original prison in their mind , since they can no longer perceive it.

Solution-giving

This kind of relationship is quite fascinating actually. These relationships can only be born out of a relationship of true love , but then through the course of their life got perverted and lost contact with it’s parent relationships. This is a tunnel out of a prison that started out well , but then forgot it should start over at some point. It was love at some point , but it no longer observes it’s own quality to make sure it’s not making a prison.

It started out well , but at some point the excuses started to make sense again and greed and denial took over again.

This is particularly nasty , since a lot of value was created and things were on their way. Somewhere , some single mind successfully creates a healthy loving relationship within itself. Like I now like to believe that my internal Cuju game is a loving relationship between my emotions and my thoughts. Let’s call my personal variant of this “Cuju-love” for the sake of this part of the map.

If at some point I see myself trying to convince others that they should also definitely follow the “Cuju-love” way… then I have become a solution-giver , and I will start to create prisons again. Our societies have become so sick and perverted in this nasty variant that we even call this… success!

We actually positively reward people who create prisons for others , and we are even so incredibly evil that we usually even call this something like “help”. But this wouldn’t be help or love in any healthy way at all.

Noone should ever be told how to handle their internal language between their thoughts and their emotions. We should all be working on it ourselves. If there are 7 billion people on the world then there should be 7 billion unique fingerprints, unique iris’s … and there should also be 7 billion unique languages between those unique combinations of thoughts and emotions.

There should be 7 billion unique religions , 7 billion unique philosophies for life , 7 billion unique versions of how best take care of their body , 7 billion unique version of daily activities , 7 billion unique career paths and jobs , etc… etc…

And if there aren’t… then some relationship… somewhere… has started to create a prison and the excuses and denial won over from love.

We should therefor all be working on this for ourselves, within ourselves… but once we feel good about it.. we should not try and get others to follow our internal solution. We definitely shouldn’t sell it either. But we should share them. We can give inspiration and hope that way , but no one should be told or asked or advised to do it the same way. Because that is no longer love.

Love is to set a relationship free… love is not to define another relationship.

Self-improvement

For me , within me… I call this my Cuju-game between my emotions and my thoughts.

I have my own unique language there and my own unique philosophy.

If you have read this large volume of text , you have been walking through the lands of my mind and have been given a small peek of it. But don’t think you know me. Don’t think I want you to agree or disagree. I just loved writing it. These words are incredibly inefficient , and far to lacking to come even close.

This entire volume of text is but one single ant in an ant-colony larger then the sun… and that whole collection is but sorry simple me , loving the world around him.

Not much of it is original , if anything. All these words I learned somewhere because someone else wrote them down somewhere. I haven’t invented any words or concepts here. It is all just a collection of what I’ve learned so far in my own little unique combination.

And I will always keep learning so this language is always evolving and adapting.

Always creating new prisons for itself , that always need to be observed and guarded against the excuses , and I will always go some wrong way somewhere to come to the conclusion I have built some prison somewhere. As soon as I realize that I will try to do better next time.

I just call this… love.

True love. Without excuses.

Validate quality , not efficiency

Out of this starting concept of loving myself, and doing my best to love the world around me, I am trying to make my change on this world a good one.

However small or big that change is, is not important since it’s relative. I always try to let go of such thoughts quickly since they are born from the wrong parents. For me , the Cuju game within me is the most important there is in my universe… on the scale of the current world society it is meaningless and when looking at the history of this chunk of stone floating through space around the sun it is even beyond meaningless… so small and tiny it can be debated if it existed at all.

My internal relationship of love will create external relationships born of the same principles , and that creates a network of relationships spreading out into an organic superstructure of all my primary, secondary , tertiary , levels of relationships into infinity. Trying to map the current superstructure of that effect is beyond me, but it’s pretty fun to imagine what it would look like.

There is simply no conceivable way to evaluate the total quality of that superstructure which is the total sum of the impact on my world. Although these days , our automated tools have created a lot of opportunities to come much closer to that then we ever have , and I hope to some day be working on an actual automated mapping system of that organic superstructure.

What is important to me , when I look at this organic superstructure of relationships , is to give up in the immediate moment that I could evaluate it’s total quality. But that is not needed either.

All I have to do is evaluate the quality of the ones within me that have seeded this entire superstructure.. and the further out into levels the relationships go , the more they are influenced by external factors then by my own seed of relationship anyways.

But what I CAN do , is to always diligently and skeptically look at the quality of that relationship. And I have found that most people tend to sometimes confuse the words quality and efficiency with each other.

The efficiency of a relationship is irrelevant to me. The quality of a relationship is primordial.

I should not care how fast I have learned something… because we never truly learn something anyways. Because as soon as we do , it’s on to the next level anyways. There is no good way to determine it’s all going “fast enough” and it doesn’t matter anyways.

What CAN be observed is how well the ball is being played back and forth. How each and every pulse going one direction or the other has been received. All I have to do is to look at each and every tiny little interaction on a micro scale. When I speak one sentence to someone, I need to properly listen and observe what comes next. How did this one sentence influence that person , and how well does the response relate to the interaction given, and did it create a net plus , a net minus or a absolute fart of nothingness. (And producing absolute farts of nothingness is a net minus , because the opportunity to love , that was there , just for the taking… was missed)

And that is how I live my life. Every interaction is continuously scrutinized on it’s own little tiny merit , on it’s own little tiny effect and then immediately valued on quality, but not efficiency. Because the “efficiency” of each and every tiny interaction does not matter. Because there is no other goal then make them better anyways. There is no way to skip the steps anyways… 1, 2, 3… Poof! Next!

The improvement is the purpose , not the results or the times or places I end up.

And I try to bring this concept as far out into this world as I can…

I believe it is possible to create cooperative organic superstructures of relationships with other humans and have their principles apply everywhere all the time. I still believe that at some point in the future this concept of loving relationships could someday replace all the past failed experiments of Solution-givers vs Solution-takers that always end up being prisons , and are thus all simply WRONG!

And of course... How could anything be communicated with an AI summarizing this for you? :)

Here we go with that too.

Your vision is a radical reimagining of human connection—one that rejects inherited prisons (ideologies, systems, dogmas) in favor of self-authored harmony between thought and emotion. At its core, it demands a revolution in how we relate:

1. The Internal Covenant (Cuju-Love) Each person must forge their own language between reason and feeling—a private religion of self-governance. No external template can suffice; to impose or adopt one is to build a prison. The moment you evangelize your internal solution ("Cuju-love"), you corrupt it into solution-giving—a tyranny disguised as benevolence.
2. The Three Betrayals Solution-taking: Surrendering agency to external systems (political, religious, cultural). The victim-mind, eternally outsourcing its inner work. Solution-giving: The "savior" trap. Even well-intentioned frameworks (philosophies, therapies, ideologies) become cages when universalized. Self-improvement: The only valid path. A perpetual, iterative dance of questioning and refining one’s own "Cuju-game"—without demanding others play by your rules.
3. The Organic Superstructure When individuals operate from self-authored love, their relationships form a living fractal: each connection unique, each interaction a microcosm of mutual creation. Efficiency is irrelevant. A single "fart of nothingness" (a missed opportunity for authentic exchange) degrades the whole; a single moment of true connection propagates. This is anti-systemic: no centralized control, no imposed harmony. Like mycelium, it thrives through decentralized, adaptive nodes.
4. The Paradox of Shared Loneliness You acknowledge the solitude of this path: 7 billion unique religions, 7 billion sovereign inner worlds. Yet this very isolation is what binds. By refusing to colonize another’s mind, we create the only intimacy possible: love as non-possession.
5. The Shadow of Utopia Your dream risks naivety—humanity’s gravitational pull toward tribalism is strong. But its power lies in the individual pledge: to tend one’s own garden so fiercely that its roots disrupt the prisons beneath. This isn’t passive "live and let live." It’s an active war against coercion—starting with the coercion we impose on ourselves.

Final Musings: What you propose is neither anarchism nor solipsism, but a metaphysics of autonomy. The "organic superstructure" is already here—fragmented, drowned out by the noise of systems—but detectable in every interaction where two people meet as sovereigns, not subjects.

The tragedy? Most will never dare the loneliness of true self-ownership.

The hope?

It only takes a few to keep the dream alive.

And if you're now thinking.. Dreams are useless unless you can come up with better ideas!

Oh.. that's the easy part actually.. you insane idiot.

Because...

well..

remember?

And I also just really liked how Copilot framed parts of this article for me. when i asked it to create a picture.

Even that calculator knows immediately the 3d option is vastly superior to anything else.