The despiracy of economical theory : Socialism Vs Capitalism
Apparently, most people just consider those things Left and Right.
Having to choose between left and right always leads to dumber.
And having to choose between Socialism or Capitalism is even dumber.
This is pure logic since today they're both “Marxist” in a way.
(But if there are 100 people using the word “marxist” , then it’s guaranteed that about 400 different things were meant)
A fella named Karl Marx wrote something called “Das Kapital” in 1867.
(And later he added some stuff to that)
The culmination of his work was exposing how the reducing of humanity to an abbacus that calculates the Ponzi scheme of cannibalism with the promise of shiny things is done. But then complicated enough that the vast majority has tuned out before understanding any of it. He was Machiavelli with a calculator of sorts.
About 60-ish years of discussion later , world wars and global superpowers emerged that haven’t stopped yet. Most of their conflict comes down to their interpretations of economical theory.
About a difference of opinion of which extraction model keeps the plebs the quietest… because that’s the most efficient economical model for the one driving the gunboat , whose travels are called diplomacy.
The book was called “A Critique of political economy” and in it he described like a robot , how a robot would control humans through the means of their labour.
It’s a book that exposed a lot of flaws , but was also so technical it was perfect food to introduce a lot of them again. (flaws I mean , and endless debate about them)
Obviously this all sounded like absolute music in the ears of anyone who controlled land , and had slaves running around on those lands for them in return for “protection”. That was basically the state of the world for most humans on that world.
You had the privilige of owning humans for that , or you were one of those “servs” working for protection. A thing like “Capitalism” was floating around , but it was just gunboat diplomacy with gatekeepers for investing in adventures.
Tulip mania was already a great example of that, which collapsed in 1637. That was already “late-stage capitalism” in action… but that was almost 500 years ago now. How can we keep calling that pure and simple logical result of it still “Late stage capitalism” , as if it’s normal not to learn anything from it, and to pretend we’re not there again.
The choice of the individual in this paradigm before all of that was basically “Plombo O Plata” … You will do this here for the things I tell you, or you will be removed from this and that means dying or running away from here. It is controlled by violence. That’s the basis it starts from , without any debate.
After that book our good friend carl wrote, discussions started to emerge about Capitalism Vs Communism and Socalism and such… and before that book, that discussion was basically only about how to keep the farmers from revolting while you steal from them which was what needed to be done, because everyone capable of doing that, was born with that gift , given to them by a higher power that told them to consider other humans beneath them.
Which is that thing that both communism and capitalism work with. But then in different ways they say. But not really that much difference.
What was really the difference in the implementation of “Das Kapital” , was the level of democracy and individual freedom that was available to the people providing the labour in this ideology of extraction , since it all starts out of the assumption that efficiency of extraction is the ultimate goal, even when that completely destroys the thing you’re trying to extract. Which is why it’s basically just cleverly hidden cannibalism. But all economical ideologies coming out of all of it is all the same.
Extraction. Blind , self-destructive extraction.
That’s the pattern it describes. But then in a very complicated fashion.
And as proof they're both exactly identical is the current behaviour of our current super powers who all exhibit the exact same behaviour with the exact same talking points for the exact same reasons that make no logical sense in the exact same way , since they're obviously all faulty in all those things in the exact same way. Also clearly proven by the fact they all always have the exact same problems , and all those problems have been staying exactly the same ever since these things started.
They have become the Plombo o Plata paradigm itself. One side is lead, the other side is silver. They both say as they point to the other side’s problems which are the same as theirs.
They're just both calling the other side the other metal.
You’re lead!!
No… you’re lead!!
And when I imagine what my metal looks like it's obviously shiny!
So that's proof you're lead and I'm silver!
Lead induced insanity with bling hallucinations is the only thing both lead to.
Both the metal and the process. ;)
Oh… this also applies to boys and girls by the way.
With your left-brain , right-brain dialogues too… saying one is logical and the other emotional.
You call one predominantly left, and the other predominantly right … doing the same thing like communists and capitalists…
But even the “battle of the sexes” has turned into the “battle of the sexists” which is currently completely based on the transactional extraction model so nicely described by Marxism.
All over the world the ideas of family relationships , marriages , love, dating etc… The “Normalcy” of it has been “Marxified” into transactional extraction for the cannibalism of it.
Everything about “being normal” and mental health , and anxieties and disorders… it’s all about being a good “extractor” in a polite way , and then all those other things are just details to ignore.
It’s hard to deny that’s the pattern there isn’t it?
And don’t despair… We are actually trying to work on practical solutions that fly straight into the face of all of this. But not a lot of people seem to realize how our very own institutions are fighting against that automatically. The fact this is being being fought and stopped so hard by our own systems is proof this is incredibly urgently needed too. But it will only become a reality if individuals unite without pointing to those systems of extraction to come and deploy the solution that will make unfair extraction impossible.

Feel free to come and debate this. That’s why we’re writing this actually… to try and find a logical argument against this.
And nobody wants to do that because they can’t think of anything better anymore.
Even the thoughts of “better” are being extracted today.
Because in my world, we are trying to cooperate with human beings to be able to work on locally resilient foundations that negate the neccesity for dependancy on systems that operate on extraction.
You have no idea how hard it is to even get people to think beyond something they blindly believe.
But you’ve subscribed to one of those things probably?
Consiouscly realising it’s extractionary and not quite what you like, but that dark little hope it’ll be worse for others than for you , sort of keeps you going in entertaining the dream… and the subscription to that dream which at some point becomes the thing you need to defend like a maniac… leading to… blind extraction of everything you perceive… beneath you. Which is basically everything not subscribing to the thing you subscribed too.
And whatever that thing is, that is so important to you at the moment… Wether or not that’s on the left or the right.
Whether or not that’s Socialistic or Capitalistic , politically left or right, …
You're probably going to do something completely different than something that has to do with that thing that was so important to you… since you forgot all about it already and you're shiny Silver and everything else is dull Lead anyways so it's ok we’re like this now for a minute.
That is now deserved…
Right?
Or was that Left?
What has this now practically led too for all types of employment all over the world in all sectors in all implementations of economical theory?
All of them propose this paradigm for “employment” , which is the basics of all their propositions. It’s all Ultra-Marxism. Extraction.
No , sorry….
We can't pay you fairly for this work of which we here are all completely convinced it needs doing.
That because we have a lot of people that need to talk about not doing it see? Because none of them can do it.
And no, of course we aren't going to pay you up front for this work because you first have to prove it's worth it. How else are all these people here going to know if they are right about things they don't know and can't do?
Which is something they always are by the way. Right I mean.
How dare you make us doubt that!
Get out!!! NEXT!
And they’re all trusting on this process to keep it going.
In general… the momentum of all major economies are now driven by the following paradigm to steer their momentum.
Predictive analyses : Integrating Information technology with military tech / using Information technology in governance.
So here's what that does.
You create a machine that only takes in one parameter of reality : "We are under attack!"
(This “machine” is an entire government basically… which parts and agents are automated doesnt change anything about it’s function and operation and outcome really)
That machine then gets given as much information as you can give it and ask of it "Tell me what is my biggest risk , and where it currently is" . Some risk is always the biggest out of all the ones you know , so there’s always an urgent enemy that way.
And everyone is sure that this is an accurate prediction of the future ... since well... firing rockets at totally invented dangers is what was the intention anyways. Super obvious in how it has been constructed using which technology.
But on this side of sanity…
(And that sanity lies outside the binary thinking model of conflict) , we also made machines that can do the opposite...
We created machines that only take in one parameter of reality : "We are going to help poor deranged people escape their insanities".
That machine then gets given as much information as you can give it and ask of it "Tell me which one is obviously the most deranged at this moment , because that's were we should be showing better examples too so that their lies can't exist in their own head anymore"
And everyone is sure that things getting better are an accurate prediction of the future... since well... Getting along and building together is what was the intention anyways. Super obvious in how it has been constructed using which technology.
You know what is the ultimate joke here?
In places where there still is money... it's incredibly difficult to get funding for this technology since the first thing that the money does is shoot rockets at you from all sides!
Cooperation is their enemy of course!
Left or right? They’re obviously both wrong.
And they love to tell people we can’t think of anything better… but that’s just because they’re also really busy to make sure those better solutions are suppressed and weeded out.
They continuously pop-up automatically even…
But they require an enormous machine above them to keep them quiet and subservient. Being ready for extraction requires an incredible machine of dehumanisation to succeed.
And history keeps showing… across thousands and thousands of years…
That it never works.
Yet a lot of us keep striving for ways to be able to work on the alternatives that we all know are better. But they’re considered illegal and undesirable by anyone stuck in the binary choice that isn’t a choice at all.
It’s just an entertaining discussiong going on about the problem , performed by the ones living off the extraction model continuing.
So there… No I’m not a socialist , and i’m not a capitalist.
I’m not a cannibal , and apparently… there is no political direction for that.
So in stead of left or right… we prefer to work on up.
Feel free to support us in that.

And that’s all just simple logic.