In a way that everyone can relate too.

It's sort of like a Lightsaber through the wedding cake of 15 masters degrees. Just to help everyone try and figure out some basic things to try and calm them down about how everything works.

Since there's a little bit of confusion about that here and there... sometimes, maybe? About a few little details, that perhaps… Are maybe really important?

I was thinking of framing the problems of society as a layered issue ... That always makes things simpler for everyone doesnt it?

At the bottom are lots of people with no individual impact on society at all , except as a reduction to a statistic.

In the middle are a whole lot of people who's function of that layer is to measure their own layer, and the interactions with the upper layer of "management" .

The sensor layer as you will.

And at the top is management, that gives the sensor a mission to go measure , out of their perspective of "So so far , we have saved the worlds from total annihilation yet another day, and that is only because of us so to keep saving humanity we have to check our sensors for data of our management system collapsing."

And this is basically a way to try and explain the concept of emerging properties to people who feel they aren’t “scientific” … and that’s why they should listen to people who… know better.

And to make sure that ... umm... people who don't have 15 masters degrees like I do can still follow me... Because lets face it... all these complicated things of science and such... I always loose everybody with my difficult words , so I ask around to make sure I'm still being understood here.

After today… Mixed in with some scientific fiction that shows these same stories , we’re going to be taking some strolls through the lands of healthcare, both physical and mental.

And explore all the ways that our current data paradigm is making everything worse , in stead of better there. And the solutions to all these things are really simple. Sure, nothing’s easy.

But why overcomplicate things when simple does the trick?

Because a lot of people live off of needless complication, which has more downsides than upsides and that destroys good things. And you just have to learn to stop that.

Now I know you’ll have a lot of reflexes in your mind to push all these uncomfortable feelings away. Obviously.

But here’s another way to try and point out as simply as possible why none of them will work , and… Most importantly… Please realise that whatever you’re thinking or want to say about this article… That THAT is exactly what this article was about too.

So take your responding thought to this article , let those thoughts read this article again , and see if you can come up with something better this time?

Because it applies to so many things.

Politics and policy?

So imagine the business case for the following logic of "pre-emptive" assurances.

It's a policy paradigm which could be applied to many things.

I always find it an immensely fascinating but discombobulating discussion when the following things come up.

• Freedom
• Total Freedom
• the necesseties of limiting it since "total" is too total anyways , so there is no other option than to accept limited freedom.
• Because there are neccesities and limitations , so you can't just always do what you want
• And you can't do anything else than wanting bad things see
• So therefor we do all this research , adjustments, tests, reporting of that process, punishment caluclations, discussion forums and investigative correctional machinations to make sure that freedom is secured. Absolutely.

There are many variations of this standpoint. On an dazzingly number of topics. And it's a raison d'aitre for well... a lot of people. We are all being saved by our self-saving-in-service-of-the-self-saving-collective that has to be selfish or we would all be dead because of absolute freedom which is impossible and you are going to do bad things!

So... ok. without debating the relative value of that thesis (yet) , I would just like to observe that the solution is at the very least... ummm... expensive? And somewhat... inefficient, perhaps when considering the following?

My life is filled with predominantly good behaviour.. mistakes being made and a lot of respect for strength in diversity. Punishment is a very rare thing. Starting points and directions... but so... that's my starting point. (I don't need extensive research and discourse wether or not that is possible, since that is literally... my life. So, ummm.. proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.

And from my starting point which i like to codename "my life", and the direction of "better", it doesn't start with the punishment of limitation to ensure there is punishment for the unavoidable resulting bad behaviour. (Which requires a lot of research, and needs to be loud)

Coming out of that starting point, evolving into a certain direction... this thesis that i just heard of yours, sort of had the procedural equivalent of a Seagull going skweeeaaaaak loudly , flying over our heads in the opposite direction while badly aiming some droppings at my head as I am enjoying top speed on my Solar-steam-powered hydrofoil funboat across the pearls of the mediterranean coastlines...

This AI artwork is what we call… “Close but no Cigar!” , but we digress… Let’s visit another layer of this lovely cake here.

Healthcare?

It's about the morality of equitable distribution of available healthcare services. Which is something that’s humane to offer for free if the patient had an accident and is suffering due to actions outside of his control. It should be free it if's a consequence of force majeure.

We all agree on that.

And then the plot thickens with for instance... smoking and drinking.

both are "bad for your health" , so the consequences of needing healthcare of doing something bad to yourself shouldn't be free, since it takes valuable resources away from the ones who suffer due to force majeur. The "helping" the needy is abused by the addicted to support the continuation of their addictions.

And you all keep ping-ponging to try to make better individual choices about each human in that case while not even coming close to understanding the human , and not even coming close to truly being to tell if these consequences are the result of addiction or force majeur, because even addicts can get into an accident that had nothing to do with the addiction.

If someone is suffering from liver cirrosis , but is on the way to improving that by having a fruit juice on a terras and he is the victim of a drive-by shooting , and it pierces his liver... does he apply to getting a donor liver to save his life?

And that's even a simple one... imagine the situations after 300 tests about deseases noone really knows anything about anyways and noone involved knows anything about the life of the patient except the things they ask that that specific test needed.

But... Combine those 2 previous headings up there in the beginning of this article... and the solution is so obvious it should hurt your head.

Medical aid which seems just "likely" to perhaps also be the result of addictive or destructive behaviour can be given freely to those people in all cases... but that care is only legal to provide within the paradigm of a support organisation that works on the addiction.

Voila... solved.

Free fixing of your problems, as long as you continuously suffer the progamme that tries to steer you away from the behaviour that caused it.

the combination of a part of the hospital services , and the detox centers. (And you should not group these according to observed systems of behaviour , but simply by their physical symptoms... ) grouped by the treatments you can efficiently group... and the humans seeking help with their liver will end up in places where there are a lot of acohol addicts that can help eachother while there is no alcohol available anywhere.

And the funny part? Just observing the behaviour of those patients going from detox center to detox center where they get free medical treatmant, will be empirical proof of the root causes of all deseases actually. The statistic of that will present in actual reality by the evolution of the combination of addictive therapies and medical therapies that coalesce in the best centers.

No other medical research needed... AT ALL !

How's that for efficiency? For healthcare that works? for people being helped and the equity of distributing simple humanity humanely?

And there is not a single thing you can logically say to disprove any of it.

Energy and stuff?

We’ve been there remember?

So... We solved the energy crisis... but nobody has the time to read it seems.

Around the turn of the last century... The entire global concept of humanity took a horrifyingly wrong turn.

Dominic SedraniDominic Sedrani

Startup Idea : Green hydrogen farming hybrid fishingboat delivery service of goods, people and services.

Being able to nurture and maintain proper interactions of humans and environment. It comes naturally to me, and it seems quite a challenge to the vast majority of people.

Dominic SedraniDominic Sedrani

But the internet!!! It’s going to save us!

Yeah right.

Talking to the cloud about Cloud-isms

Free digital services turn children into weapons of mass destruction since it was created by the same military-industrial complex that has to find a market for people to have a reason to shoot guns at something by the time they grow up. And there's not a single logical argument that could exist that can refute that ... Because... just talk to whoever do…

Dominic SedraniDominic Sedrani

And actually , it really could.

But not if you keep being trapped in those other chapters first.

Wow… Imagine the human being that read all of this… I don’t think they exist anymore.

Reach out if you made it this far ;)

Oh… we forgot food right?

Why Fig trees make bad products.

And the price is just right!

Dominic SedraniDominic Sedrani