It's a simple question... which answer would you choose?

So there's something very strange and off about all choices that all great military forces have been making these past 120 years. And that you all keep believing it has been a big surprise to me ever since I was 5 years old.

It's a simple question...  which answer would you choose?
It was a Halloween party... I promise... Guess who I was?

Let's take just a few examples here , and then we can ask a simple question about that.

Are they really just that stupid , weak and miserable... or are they just pretending they're that stupid, while being deranged about that?

Each and every leader of each and every military force in this world in the past 120 years got "elected" with the same story before they get "elected" by "the people".

We all know what sort of crazy stuff people like Putin and Bibi and Kim and Orban and such like to say.
I don't like to punch down towards mental retards with small inept penises and no courage, so lets not go there shall we?

The poor little fella's can't help they were born with a negative IQ, a lack of feeling and a bunch of psychopathic cannibals around them.
They're too obvious you know?
We all know the answer to the question for them and the things they do and say. There's not much point in even asking the question there.

But that doesn't mean that a lot of people have places in history, and places in power today that don't require this very important question to be asked though.

Are they really just that stupid , weak and miserable... or are they just pretending they're that stupid, while being deranged about that?

Example number 1.

Eisenhower. A Republican US president in power for 8 years. When he started his job the US had about 1000 nuclear warheads ready to launch , and by the time he left they had about 23000.

Yet at the end of his presidency he was giving speeches about how dangerous the military industrial complex is, and that we really need to do something about that.

Since they also learned through their new spy planes (the U2 planes leaving out of Belgium for instance... ) that Russia only had 4 of those very same things.

So it starts with 4 to a thousand... and in his 8 years he takes it too 24-24000 and then says you all need to be really scared by the things "these people" do... yo know... about that thing he just did!

"The potential for misplaced power exists and will persist" he said right before he packed his bags and left.

The next president after that is JFK! Everyone's favourite little cute boy. A Democrat too... And before he gets elected he gives speeches like...

"The fundamental problem of our time is the steady erosion of American power relative to that of the communists in recent years" (24 to 24000 remember? They spent billions on proving that too at the same time)

Once elected president he says

"Only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt, can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed"

While employing them continuously ... Until they shot him.

After the Cuban missile crisis. What a doozy that was. apparently Russia decided that because the americans put nuclear missiles in Turkey and Italy and were running spy planes out of Belgium and who knows where else... That they need to have a missile (one of those 24 against those 24000) in another country aimed at America too, because it would be too far to shoot nuclear missiles across Europe and the pacific...

But ummm... hello little stupid people... America and Russia are only separated by the bearing straight and they're literally neighbours.

Neither have ever needed anyone else to be able to throw a rock by hand towards a citizen of the other side of the cold war from the "protection" of their own country, while the receiver of that rock to the head would be standing in his country.

Both Russia and America keep pretending they're not neighbours because they're on opposite sides of the earth?

So... both the American and Russian regimes have been flat earthers all this time but are pretending they're smarter than that?

What does that say of the intelligence of anyone who believes anything about them really? What does this all say about the "global conflicts" really?

Are they really just that stupid , weak and miserable... or are they just pretending they're that stupid, while being deranged about that?

Remember that Nixon fella? He definitely was NOT a crook he said. :) I mean... can you stop yourself from laughing like a maniac when you consider that?

He said "Even though we are strongest military in the world, we desperately need to increase our strength!"

Nuff said...

We can keep going... not a single leader in the G20 has been elected on any other story than things more stupid than flat earthers really.

Here's a theory.

The military industrial complex of all these countries help eachother creating eternal conflict, and the stories they have to use to get you to believe it's inevitable are just too freakin insane to even entertain as fiction.

It's not even good enough for fiction! You'd walk out of that movie halfway because it wouldn't be believable! But as long as you get payed for being a part of it, it's all ok all of a sudden?

You all lap it up. You all assume it's normal, but it isn't.

Elected governments don't decide anything. They're pretending because it's a job.

The production facilities of goods and services for war are the engine of all countries that consider themselves "wealthy" and/or "powerful" today. And absolutely nothing else.
(all digital services have only been created by them, and for them too)

All GDP is just a measure of how big their insane, indoctrinated legions of braindead drones called soldiers are... and some of them get "elected" to titles like "presidents" and "first ministers" and a bunch of other stuff.

And not much else.

There are no other options to consider when you look at choices made BEFORE every major conflict in the world in the last 120 years.

Not a single one has a different logical options to answer the question with then these two binary options.

Are they really just that stupid , weak and miserable... or are they just pretending they're that stupid, while being deranged homicidal cannibalistic maniacs which is something they lie about being... obviously?

Or can you really honestly come up with a different reason for why they do this?

Is there a third option to add in that question?

I'd love to hear it.

Prove me wrong... please!