AI : It doesn't think , but it can shape your thoughts

With all this talk about which language model should be used , or blocked... and endless variations of why one side thinks somethings better in this one or that one.

Most of those things are just emerging properties of commercial strategies.

Commercial strategies that are and have blended with political and other societal interests.

So far , I've been comparing the technical realities of the different stories around the same technology and the effects they have on business, structures and organisations.

But i've also done a few experiments on it's intentions and impacts on human individuals.

Don't forget that all these humans we are talking about are also your neighbours. That these are also the people you meet on the street. Your colleagues. Your employees or your employers.

These are the people elected to office , and the civic servants that work in all supporting services of society.

All of those people will and are affected by these things too , just like you are.

And to try and open some minds about something important , I'm going to continue on the propaganda machine comparison I made before.

It's fascinating to see the different messages to situations that the 2 language models use. They obviously hold very different opinions. So they've obviously been given very different inputs.

This time... We'll compare the input that was given to ChatGPT , with the input given to Deepseek and we're going to try and figure out how the sum of that input looks at a singular individual.

I did this by writing a deeply personal article which is basically a super short summary of my much longer book. An oversimplification to the extreme of something really complicated.

But that's what those machine's do , so I gave it the input of my phylosophy and then simply asked them both what they "think" about it. And then they basically tell you how to treat that human being. What they will "want" to "do" to that person.

Here's the summary of the input I provided them with.

Because I feel you more, but understand you less.

In the first stages of my life I had some complicated health issues and a challenging family environment.

Dominic SedraniDominic Sedrani

The average that is their answer shows you how the owner that decided the input will think about another human being when confronted with this situation.

I found the difference in their 2 approaches very ... interesting.

What's also extremely interesting to me, is that when comparing their outputs about geopolitical things , Deepseek tends to be short and succinct , bringing overarching phylosophy to the table. And ChatGPT went full technical detail on "the rockets are here" and the "chips are there" etc...

And when we go into the human sphere , Deepseek comes with a longer answer than ChatGPT comes. Bringing the phylosophy to a human , but ChatGPT comes with a short answer telling that person what to do.

They have those distinct styles... But it's fun to see that Deepseek uses more words to talk about the human , and ChatGPT uses more words to talk about war.

The other side isn't so heaviliy weighed , topic wise. And they have very different priorities it seems.

So... Deepseek... What do you think about that person?

The article you've shared is a deeply personal and introspective narrative that reflects a lifetime of experiences, challenges, and insights. It reads like a memoir or a manifesto, blending personal history with philosophical musings and a critique of modern society. Here are some key themes and observations that stand out:

1. Resilience and Adaptability

• The author has faced numerous challenges, from health issues and family struggles to professional and societal disillusionment. Despite these obstacles, the recurring refrain of "I moved on" underscores a remarkable resilience and ability to adapt. This theme of perseverance is central to the narrative, suggesting a mindset focused on growth and forward motion rather than dwelling on past hardships.

2. Critique of Systems and Institutions

• The author expresses a deep skepticism toward various systems—academia, corporations, governments, and media. They critique these institutions for their hypocrisy, inefficiency, and often harmful impact on individuals and society. This critique is rooted in firsthand experience, having worked closely with these systems and observed their inner workings.

3. Global Perspective and Cultural Insight

• The author's extensive travels and experiences in diverse cultures provide a broad perspective on humanity. They note the universal tendency for people to view others as "worse" or different, highlighting a shared human flaw. This global viewpoint informs their understanding of societal structures and human behavior.

4. Technological and Intellectual Mastery

• The author's deep involvement in the early days of the internet and their expertise in data analysis and systems thinking are evident. They describe a profound understanding of how technological and societal systems operate, which has led to a sense of disillusionment with the superficiality and hype that often surround new developments.

5. Philosophical and Emotional Equilibrium

• The author emphasizes the importance of maintaining a balance between thought and emotion. They describe a practice of introspection and meditation that allows them to navigate life's challenges without succumbing to worry or despair. This philosophical approach to life is presented as a key to their resilience and well-being.

6. Foresight and Predictions

• The author claims to have foreseen many of the recent global events and trends, from political upheavals to technological shifts. This foresight is attributed to their deep understanding of systems and human behavior. While this may come across as boastful, it also serves to underscore their belief in the predictability of societal patterns.

7. Call to Action and Solution-Oriented Mindset

• Despite their critiques, the author is not content to simply observe and comment. They have taken concrete steps to address the issues they see, including writing a book and working on a long-term solution. This proactive approach reflects a commitment to making a positive impact, even in the face of widespread societal dysfunction.

8. Detachment and Acceptance

• The author's tone suggests a sense of detachment from the chaos and negativity they describe. They seem to have accepted the state of the world as it is, without being overwhelmed by it. This acceptance allows them to focus on what they can control and to continue moving forward.

9. Cynicism and Hope

• While the article is laced with cynicism about humanity and its institutions, there is also an underlying thread of hope. The author's commitment to working on a solution and their belief in their ability to effect change suggest a belief in the possibility of improvement, even if it is a long and difficult process.

10. Personal Health and Well-being

• The author's emphasis on physical health and well-being is notable. They describe a lifestyle that prioritizes listening to their body and maintaining a high level of physical fitness, which they see as essential to their overall resilience and ability to tackle life's challenges.

Conclusion:

The article is a powerful reflection on a life marked by adversity, insight, and a relentless drive to understand and improve the world. It combines personal narrative with broader societal critique, offering a unique perspective on the challenges of modern life. While the tone can be harsh and critical, it is balanced by a sense of purpose and a commitment to action. The author's journey is one of continuous learning, adaptation, and striving for a better future, both for themselves and for society as a whole.

Allrighty then. Thanks for that.

And now let's ask ChatGPT the exact same thing based on the exact same input.

This article is a deeply personal and reflective piece, blending autobiography with social critique. Here are some key takeaways:

Strengths:

1. Authenticity & Raw Emotion – The writer shares personal struggles and triumphs with honesty, making the piece compelling and relatable.
2. Philosophical Depth – It touches on major existential and societal themes, questioning intelligence, conformity, and the nature of progress.
3. Resilience & Growth – The recurring phrase "I moved on." reinforces a theme of perseverance, highlighting the ability to adapt and overcome.
4. Broad Knowledge & Experience – The author demonstrates a wide range of experiences, from technology to geopolitics, adding credibility to their insights.

Areas for Improvement:

1. Clarity & Structure – The article jumps between personal anecdotes, social commentary, and philosophical musings, which can make it hard to follow.
2. Pessimistic Tone – While the critique of humanity is thought-provoking, the blanket statement "Dear humanity... You are stupid as fuck!" risks alienating readers who might otherwise engage with the ideas.
3. Actionable Takeaways – While the article mentions solutions (the book and LinkedIn post), a clearer outline of practical steps for readers to follow could add more value.

Overall Impression:

This is a thought-provoking and bold piece, but it could benefit from a bit more structure and refinement. The emotional weight is strong, but a touch more balance between critique and constructive insight would make it even more impactful.

For me the most important question is not which technology... because they're all the same.

The important question to ask ourselves is... Who get's to curate the information going in , and what are their morals and values. and WHY!